Saturday, September 4, 2010 Contact us  

Click here to subscribe to our e-mail newsletter!

Click here to donate to the Institute

Bookstore

   home : press releases
  
Press Releases     (view list of press releases)


Legal Scholar Compares Modern Political Practice to the “Gelasian Thesis”

For immediate release: March 13, 2008

(Revised 3/18/08)
Invoking a fifth century pope and an Islamic jihadist with a seventh century worldview, and a whole host of 20th and 21st century Catholic and Mormon politicians, on the evening of March 12, Prof Doug Kmiec of Pepperdine Law School offered a penetrating and fascinating look at the different ways that notable figures have tried to relate religion and state. Prof. Kmiec holds the Caruso Family Chair in Constitutional Law, after having taught law for several decades at the Notre Dame Law School and at Catholic University of America. He delivered the Institute’s Fourth Annual Faith and Law Lecture at the University of Minnesota Law School.

Kmiec started by referencing Christ’s admonition to give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s. Of course, Kmiec said, this leaves unspecified the detail of figuring out which is which. To help figure this out, Kmiec utilized as his baseline the sophisticated political thought of Pope Gelasius, who presided over the Catholic Church 492 AD. The "Gelasian Thesis" was developed in the wake of the Post-Constantine arrangement that gave the church complete freedom and which, earlier in the fifth century, had led to an overly cozy relation that was not healthy for either church or state. (E.g., the state was settling internal church disputes, appointing clergy) Gelasius argued that every person had dual citizenship; that is, there are over every person "two powers:" The first – that of the church – is responsible for salvation, including the emperor’s and is the "weightier" of the two. The second, is the earthly power over purely temporal matters, which, ought to be respectful of Divine authority, since Gelasias taught all authority on earth comes from God (even civil authority), and earthly power ought to be construed to facilitate rather than impede a person’s moral foundation.

This still did not answer what exactly was God’s and what exactly was Caesar’s, but at least, it clearly stated a priority for God.

The 16th century reformation – perhaps unintentionally – had the effect of challenging this priority, since Luther’s conception of a universal priesthood had the effect of reducing the deference to the Catholic church, and in the centuries that followed that lack of deference translated into a more pronounced state and a lesser church. Modern philosophers like Rousseau and Hobbes who denied man’s dual citizenship and who desired to put him squarely under the total will of the state aided and abetted this decline of the church.

Kmiec fast-forwarded to Pope Leo XIII who was the papal authority most responsible for modern Catholic social teaching in the late 19th century. Leo was deeply conscious that giving priority to state over church in modernity could produce, as it in fact did, monstrous ideologies, such as Facism and Communism, which actually came to oppress the church. Ideologies like Communism exalted state over God. This, of course, was error and Leo wanted the USA to avoid the error by having an established church like Ireland’s, and it was this backdrop which helps explain why John Kennedy was held in some suspicion when he ran for the presidency.

Kennedy would answer the suspicion by saying his faith would not influence his politics, and while this statement perhaps helped secure his election, was this the right priority between what was God’s and what was Caesar’s?

Shortly following Kennedy’s death, the Catholic Church accepted the USA’s tradition of a non-established church not out of denial of what the Catholic tradition believes is true, but out of respect for the dignity of all human persons and free will.

Kmiec said Kennedy’s expedient disclaimer didn’t matter much at first because it was expected for Catholics parish communities to have a robust freedom of the church to form the morals of its membership through its own teaching, and by extension, church families, church schools, and even some influence over (in terms of working conditions and family wage), the workplace.

Kennedy said state first, church second; but the reality of Catholic life still gave priority to God through the parish community.

Kennedy’s statement, however, coupled with a wide range of other social factors giving rise to widespread claims of individual autonomy led to a decline in the authority of parish communities. The hyper-individualism would now be only counterweight to the state. The church increasingly was no longer seen as a separate sovereign, but instead all of us were responsible to the omnicompetent authority of the state.

But, asked Kmiec, what happens now when the state – in matters of abortion, euthanasia, same sex marriage, and the like – fundamentally contradicts church teaching? Does the state have priority? Kmiec suggested that it should not, but rather, respecting that people of many faiths profoundly disagree on these topics, Kmiec speculated that it would be preferable for the state to not take any position on them until a moral consensus might emerge, leaving them to be resolved in the interim by the moral instruction each individual receives voluntarily in one’s church community. So if Roe v. Wade were overturned, the state should not enact a law either endorsing or prohibiting abortion unless a super-majority of people express confidence in a specific morally-informed outcome. This is why the decline of the robust presence of the church in moral formation is so troubling. Without churches exercising this instructive role, we have only the state to instruct us, and that is a denial of the Gelasian two sovereign thesis. Nevertheless, said Kmiec, it is not the state – for the most part – that is stopping individuals from reviving the church as moral educator, it is us – that is, modern men and women who believe we are strong enough to make morally informed choices out of individual conscience.

What happens when we look to the state to be moral educator. Kmiec gave his answer by focusing on several US Supreme Court justices. The central question that our justices must face is this: "Should religious convictions be privately confined or should they inform judicial decision?" Would Gelasius say church should have priority over state in judicial decision-making?

The Catholic church says "no." Kmiec illustrated with Catholic jurists like Samuel Alito and John Roberts. Both were asked a version of this question in their confirmation, and both said they would follow the law. Was this the same as Kennedy, disavowing religion for state? No, said Kmiec, because the Catholic church teaches that judges – unlike presidents and members of a legislative body – are not responsible for the laws they are tasked with interpreting. Roberts said he would recuse himself if there was a direct conflict, but as a matter of morality, this was not necessary. Thus, here the Gelasian thesis allows judges to give priority to state over religion, and the church focuses her attention on ensuring moral formation, including the moral formation of those who serve legislatively or in a public policy-making position like the presidency.

According to Kmiec, it is, surprisingly, the Mormon Mitt Romney who may have best exemplified the Gelasian thesis, when he said, a few months before the end of his failed campaign for president, that Freedom needs religion and religion needs freedom. This is a restatement of the Gelasian thesis, recognizing that only a moral people can remain free, but that freedom to believe (or disbelieve) is a precondition to grasping morality. This lack of freedom or coercion is why Bin Laden does not honor the Gelasian thesis. One is not "giving" to God what is God’s if what one gives is coerced. Coerced priority of church over state is no better than the improper subordination of church to state by modern secularity.

In the end, something like the Gelasian thesis is always necessary to resolve – in this life – what is owed to God and what is owed to Caesar.

Next year’s faith and law lecturer will be Judge Edith Jones of the 4th Circuit US Court of Appeals in Houston. This year’s lecture was co-sponsored with Mars Hill Students, the Christian Legal Society, the Federalist Society, and the Terence Murphy Institute at the University of St Thomas.

   TRANSITION TO A NEW LEADER IS UNDERWAY
   January 6, 2009
   Student Apologetics Training Conference 2009
   November 20, 2008
   Jan. 23 - 7th Annual Faith & Bioethics Lecture
   November 20, 2008
   Former Toro CEO Shares His Leadership Experience
   November 19, 2008
   Do Perspectives on Population Matter?
   May 7, 2008
   The Tale of Three Ossuaries
   April 21, 2008
   Is Charity Without Faith Dead?
   February 26, 2008
   Deconstructing Secular Economic Guilt
   February 26, 2008
   Mayo Bioethicist Offers Bracing Challenge to Churches
   January 25, 2008
   Budget Reduction Forces Staff Cutback
   January 25, 2008
   Hundreds Gather for First Ever Campus-Based Apologetics Training Conference
   January 5, 2008
   What Happens if the Sun Sets on the West?
   November 27, 2007
   Is Tolerance Still Tolerable in the West?
   November 16, 2007
   Lecture Addresses Question of Unbelief
   November 16, 2007
   Does Theology Belong in the University?
   November 9, 2007
   Can a Defeated Messiah Save Hollywood Celebrities?
   November 8, 2007
   Is God Innocent?
   November 5, 2007
   Are America’s Moral Levees Breached?
   November 1, 2007
   Does Washington Know the West's Recipe for Freedom?
   October 25, 2007
   Whatever Happened to Human Dignity?
   October 15, 2007
   Forgiveness Therapy Offers Hope to Abused Spouses
   October 7, 2007
   Spiderman Over Science? The Western Embrace of Magic
   October 4, 2007
   A Dramatic Wag Challenges Darwin's Worldview
   October 1, 2007
   From Reason to Skepticism to Mysticism: Must the West Continue Down This Path?
   September 27, 2007
   What Made the West a Uniquely Musical Civilization?
   September 20, 2007
   Minnesota Daily Covers First Lecture in Mangalwadi Series
   September 20, 2007
   10-part Series to Examine the Soul of Western Civilization
   September 18, 2007
   Institute Expresses Condolences to Those Affected by Bridge Tragedy
   August 2, 2007
   Three University of Minnesota Veritas Conversations Planned for Fall
   July 27, 2007
   Bob Osburn Discusses World Religions on the Radio
   July 24, 2007
   Forum to Address Charitable Choice Issue
   July 18, 2007
   Institute's New Campus Minister Discusses Student Group
   June 5, 2007
   Institute Is Planning 2007-2008 Event Schedule
   June 5, 2007
   Os Guinness Is Featured Speaker at the Institute's 25th Anniversary
   April 30, 2007
   Trade, Claims Dean, is Critical for the Poor
   April 20, 2007
   New Testament Scholar Unfolds Counter-Cultural Implications of Luke and Acts
   April 13, 2007
   Dr. Theo Stavrou to Receive Mentoring Award
   April 9, 2007
   Christianity Has a “Strange” Understanding of Truth, Says Sweet
   April 2, 2007
   Our Modern Understanding of Freedom is Nihilistic, Says Hart
   March 27, 2007
   Institute's Library Catalog Now Accessible Online
   March 6, 2007
   Religious Persecution is Worsening Globally, Says Marshall
   February 26, 2007
   Dialogue Is Essential in Cultivating Civic Engagement, say Wolterstorff and Bernstein
   February 21, 2007
   Theo Stavrou to Receive Christian Faculty Mentoring Award
   February 12, 2007
   Biblical Feminism Inspired by 19th Century Missionary Movements, Says Haddad
   February 2, 2007
   Symposium to Address Civic Engagement
   January 30, 2007
   Institute to Offer Recommended Books Through Amazon.com
   January 24, 2007
   Palliative Care, Not Physician Assisted Suicide, Says Dr. Robert Orr
   January 24, 2007
   Campus Minister Joins Institute Staff
   January 22, 2007
   Christian Medical and Dental Personnel Potluck
   January 11, 2007
   Cal DeWitt on Speaking of Faith Program
   January 11, 2007
   In Search of a Theology of the Soul
   December 27, 2006
   Writer Challenges Assumptions of Public Debate
   December 22, 2006
   Intelligent Design Proponent Declares State-Mandated Materialism Is Impermissible
   December 7, 2006
   Church and State: The Debate at Tate
   December 4, 2006
   Flannery and the Fundamentalist South: Opponents of a Nihilistic Church
   November 20, 2006
   Oxford Philosopher Offers 2007 Holmer Lecture
   November 13, 2006
   Article Claims Jesus' Forgiveness was as Political as it was Religious
   November 9, 2006
   Institute Board Member Receives Award
   November 6, 2006
   Europe Better Demonstrates the Christian Ideal, Says Middelmann
   November 2, 2006
   Turkish Journalist Addresses the Pope's September 12 Lecture
   October 22, 2006
   International Journalists Question Media Treatment of Intelligent Design
   October 20, 2006
   Minnesota Daily Editorializes for Religion Requirement
   October 11, 2006
   “Recover the Wonder,” Declares Esolen
   October 11, 2006
   Elaine Pagels Leaves Questions Unanswered
   October 6, 2006
   Professor Argues That Modern Education Is “Debunking” Wonder
   October 3, 2006
   Conference Stresses Strength of Christian Vision for the Environment
   September 25, 2006
   Conference to Address Balance Between the Human, Engineered and Natural Worlds
   June 28, 2006
   Institute Fellow Discusses Da Vinci and the Authority of Scripture
   June 26, 2006
   Consumerism Conferences Ends With Call for Green Martyrs
   May 3, 2006
   Michael Novak Lectures on Clash of Civilizations
   April 28, 2006
   Lecture to Address Clash of Civilizations
   April 18, 2006
   David Shenk Offers Response to Lecture Report
   April 17, 2006
   Institute Lectures Span Economics, Education, and Ethics
   April 7, 2006
   Conference to Challenge Consumerism’s Grip on American Christianity
   April 4, 2006
   Muslim-Christian Dialogue at the University of Minnesota Is Strategic
   March 24, 2006
   Philosopher Peter Singer Speaks at the University of Minnesota
   March 24, 2006
   Institute Welcomes Two New Staff Members
   March 22, 2006
   Institute Board Chair Wades Into Intelligent Design Debate
   March 20, 2006
   Freedom of Conscience Is Central to Religious Liberty, Says Faith and Law Lecturer
   March 8, 2006
   Lecture to Address How to End the Culture War Honorably
   February 23, 2006
   Veritas Forum Concludes with Lecture on the Resurrection
   February 4, 2006
   Krister Sairsingh Defends Truth in Opening Veritas Forum Lecture
   February 2, 2006
   Father Neuhaus Addresses Culture Wars
   December 26, 2005
   Richard Winter Addresses Desire for Perfection
   December 21, 2005
   U Student Named Rhodes Scholar
   November 29, 2005
   Ganssle Addresses Reason and the Knowledge of God
   October 11, 2005
   Michael Behe Spoke to Packed Crowd of 500
   October 4, 2005
   Online Christian Studies Library Now Available
   August 5, 2005
   Writer Criticizes Embryonic Stem Cell Fairy Tales
   July 29, 2005
   Nancy Pearcey Book Wins Award
   July 14, 2005
   Conference to Honor Former U of M Professor Rutherford Aris
   July 7, 2005
   "The Bench" Promotes Worldview Understanding
   April 22, 2005
   Professor Reedy Lectures on Christian Faith and Economics
   March 23, 2005
   Author Makes Case for Preserving the Life of Terri Schiavo
   March 23, 2005
   Udo Middelmann Addresses Issue of Being Human
   March 9, 2005
   Dallas Willard Lecture on TV
   January 4, 2005
   Dallas Willard Challenges the Academy
   November 9, 2004
   How Do We Achieve Cultural Authority?
   November 3, 2004
   Overflow Crowd Hears Author of The Question of God
   October 27, 2004
   New Article Challenges Some of Our Allegiances
   October 15, 2004
   John Angus Campbell Delivers Challenging Lecture
   October 1, 2004
   Gay Marriage Debate Draws Overflow Crowd
   September 17, 2004
   Institute Lectures to be on Cable Access TV
   August 23, 2004
   Institute Releases Exclusive Interview With Nancy Pearcey
   August 12, 2004
   Professors Challenge Stem Cell Research
   August 6, 2004
   Institute Announces New Giving Opportunities
   August 4, 2004
   Institute Announces New Class
   July 22, 2004
   L'Abri Celebrates 50 Years This Month
   June 17, 2004
   Institute Concludes 2003-2004 Lecture Season
   April 27, 2004
   God and the Global Marketplace
   March 24, 2004
   Dramatic Price Reduction for Christian Studies Courses
   March 15, 2004
   Deconstructing The Da Vinci Code
   March 10, 2004
   Nancy Pearcey to Lecture on Christian Mind
   March 10, 2004
   New Book Looks at Missions and Entrepreneurial Strategies
   March 2, 2004
   Institute Involved in Public Debate
   February 13, 2004
   Business Ethics and Faith
   February 11, 2004
   Institute-related Faculty to Lecture on Religion and Science
   February 11, 2004
   O'Connor Examines Udo Middelmann's Critique of the American Church
   February 6, 2004
   How Do We Distribute Our Wealth?
   February 6, 2004
   Business Lecture Series Resumes on February 2
   January 28, 2004
   Dr. John Patrick to Deliver Annual Pro-Life Lecture
   January 14, 2004
   Has Society Disconnected Sex From Marriage?
   January 14, 2004
   Biblical Reliability Conference to Address Challenges to Scripture
   January 5, 2004
   Intelligent Design Symposium Held at the U of Minnesota on November 15
   November 18, 2003
   What Role Does Art Play in Our Daily Lives?"
   October 17, 2003
   Did Chief Justice Moore Go Too Far?
   October 17, 2003
   Are Christians Suffering Persecution at the Hands of Liberals?
   October 14, 2003
   Michael Paulsen Lecture Will Tackle Conventional View of Religion in the University
   October 2, 2003
   J. Richard Pearcey Challenges Madonna
   September 26, 2003
   Business Lecture Series Begins Monday
   September 25, 2003
   Vishal Mangalwadi Receives Honorary Doctorate
   September 19, 2003
   Thought-provoking New Article on the Message of Media
   September 16, 2003
   New Testament Survey Course to Begin in January
   November 29, 2002
   Dr. Jeffrey Polet Highlights the "Monstrous Logic of Terror"
  
   Rutherford Aris Passes Away
  
   5th Annual Faith and Law Lecture, March 9
  
   Faculty Mentoring Conference Brought Together Scholars From Around the Country
  
   Bob Osburn speaks March 9 at 3:30 pm
  
   Two U of M Professors Debate Intelligent Design
  
   Dr. Kent Talked About Role of Ideology in Shaping Scientific Thought
  
   Does Proselytizing Make Enemies or Disciples?
  
   Wheaton Scholar Finds Value in Judeo-Christian Values for Biodiversity Conservation
  
   Narnia on Tour Comes to Twin Cities
  
   Nancy Pearcey to speak on C-SPAN
  
   Nigel Cameron Addresses Cloning Issue
  
   More Than 600 People Attended Biblical Reliability Conference
  
   Schapp Sees Hope for the Future of Literature
  
   Gay Marriage Debate on TV
  
   University Professor Discusses 'Axiomatic Christianity'
  

Current News

Transition to a New Leader is Underway

University Professor Discusses 'Axiomatic Christianity'

Upcoming Events
Gophers' Den

As Christians, should we apologize for apologetics or should we defend it? Jan. 31st
Because of the apologetics conference this weekend, I thought it useful to... [more >>]

The Literature Student and Hermeneutics Sep. 12th
Institute Associate Michael O'Conner has written a new article for the Institute... [more >>]


PO Box 141007, Minneapolis, MN 55414 USA (612) 378-1935